May 21, 2024

Weather News Road Conditions

Weather News & Forecast

Study on the impact of weather data not transmitted in a timely manner released online in Weather and Forecasting – Hurricane Research Division

3 min read

We test how different groups of observations, which reach the computer that run weather models at different times, impact the model forecast. We find that by not using the observations that arrive late, the forecast is much worse, showing the importance of quick transmission of observations. Direct observations (those measured within the atmosphere) have a greater impact than remote observations (those viewed from afar, such as by satellites).


Millions of observations are used in global weather forecast models every day. The use of these observations relies on their quick transmission to where the models are run. This study looks at the impact of two datasets, one with all available observations and one smaller one representing what was received by NOAA by a particular time, on the accuracy of NOAA’s Global Forecast System (GFS). The GFS is run four times each day (every 6 h); the model starts from what we call initial conditions, which is the combination of all the most recent weather observations and a short forecast from the previous run (or cycle)Typically, the smaller dataset is used to create initial conditions for 14-day forecasts, and the full dataset, containing about 20% more data, is used to create the short forecast for the next cycle.

Schematic of the process to produce operational global numerical weather forecasts at NOAA. The global model produces 14-day forecasts (light blue arrows) each day starting at 0000, 0600, 1200, and 1800 UTC. Since these forecasts, must be available to forecasters by a certain time each day, they run before all weather data are available.  Short forecasts are also needed to provide the background to be combined with new weather data to start the forecast for the next cycle (dark blue arrows). Since this is a very short forecast (only to 9 h), it can be run later than the longer forecast, when more weather data are available. Adapted from NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC Global Climate and Weather Modeling Branch. Running Global Model Parallel Experiments. Version 6.0, February 18, 2015.

Important Conclusions:

  • Using the full dataset for both forecasts yields a small, statistically significant improvement in forecast skill.
  • Using the smaller dataset for both 14-day and 9-hour forecasts leads to a large degradation in forecast skill.
  • The greatest impact comes from removing observations taken from direct contact with the atmosphere, such as from weather balloons and airplanes.
  • If a single observation source’s time to reach the model increases, the impact on forecast skill may not be significant; however, if the time increases across all observation types (or all observations of a single type), the impact can be large.

For more information, contact

This study was partially funded by the NESDIS OPPA Technology Maturation Program, and supported by NOAA/OAR/AOML and U.Miami/CIMAS grant NA15OAR4320064.


2022-05-16 18:53:02

All news and articles are copyrighted to the respective authors and/or News Broadcasters. eWeatherNews is an independent Online News Aggregator

Read more from original source here…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *